Showing posts with label catholocs for choice. Show all posts
Showing posts with label catholocs for choice. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 5, 2012

natural family is the ideal, optimal, true family system



Catholics for Choice Report on Day Three and a Wrap: Rooms Available in the Persecution Complex
29 May 2012

“How can we do away with the government planning everything?” It was fitting that these words, uttered by Dr. Francisco J. González Estepa of the Asociación de Homeschoolers Evangélicos, were among some of the first on the last day of the World Congress for Families (WCF) in Madrid. González ʼ vague and genuinely fearful question helped usher in the most paranoid day of the event. That the Congress could end any other way, however was quite unlikely. With speeches such as “The Role of Media in the Education of Children/Indoctrination,” “Religious Persecution Worldwide,” “Religious Symbols in Public Spaces, a Right?,” “Promoting Fatherhood (Crisis in Manhood),” and its counterpoint, “Promoting Motherhood (Crisis in Womanhood),” the final day of the conference appeared to be specifically organized to gin up enough fear and outrage to embolden the participants in their fight against “change” and “the future” for the 12 long months stretching between May 27 and next year’s World Congress of Families in Sydney, Australia.

Per the established tone of the Congress, Dr. González’s remarks came a half hour later than expected, the attendees having taken their time emerging from Mass. Focusing on the filth and misinformation supposedly disseminated in public schools—specifically in Spain where recent years have seen great advances in sex education, contraceptive provision and laws involving rights for homosexual couples—the crowd was quite receptive. The enthusiasm for the doctor was, however, mild compared to what was shown for the man who followed after him in the lineup.

In a conference full of speakers making blood-and-thunder pronouncements, founder and publisher of Movieguide and Chairman of the Christian Film and Television Commission Ted Baehr was rivaled only by Austin Ruse of C-FAM and Alan Sears of the Alliance Defense Fund for doom-mongering.

The first three minutes of his Baehr’s presentation stuck to strengths he displayed the previous evening—talking down to the audience, touting one of his many books and whipping up fear. “I want to help you understand the influence of mass media entertainment that is not educating your children or leading them out of darkness,” Baehr warned before a screen showing the cover art of Judd Apatow’s Knocked Up, “but is quite often indoctrinating your children, leading them exactly in the wrong direction.” Baehr then went on to educate his audience on the evils of this indoctrination with a series of slides and facts—all of which were attributed to his own publication, Movieguide. Even for the WCF, this was audacious—the man was, essentially, citing himself.

With the amount of time dedicated to promoting his books, the substance of Baehr’s presentation was cut short. On the previous day, however, topics he covered included: the influence of homosexuals in the movie industry and their inherent perversion; the percentage of movies that were “Christian, Pagan, and Humanistic;” and the fact that most of the highest-grossing movies of all time were Christian or contained “Christian values.” (Never mind that, when Baehr presented a list of the 20 top-grossing movies of all time, number two was Pirates of the Caribbean—a movie about the morally upright profession of piracy, the main character of which is a sexually ambiguous buccaneer modeled on a 1960s rock-guitarist heroin addict. An appearance was also made by Thor, which is explicitly about pagan deities.) Nonetheless, Mr. Baehr was met with much applause—and I’ve no doubt he sold more than a few books.

The next session on “Religious Freedom” commenced with Javier Menéndez Ros, director ofAyuda a la Iglesia Necesitada, engaging in a bit of statistically un-cited and hyper-paranoid arithmetic. By Menéndez’ calculations, 200 million Christians are persecuted in the world each year, with 150 million more experiencing discrimination. This, according to Menéndez, meant that one-third of all persons persecuted in the world were Christian. Never mind that the words “persecution” and “discrimination” were not clearly defined—what matters is that “they” are out to get you. Who “they” are was never clearly defined at the conference, though repeat mentions were given to “the homosexuals,” “the secularists,” “the communists,” “the government,” “the entertainment industry” and “the media”—all of which presumably form some sort of cabal.

Apropos of disappearances, the next scheduled speaker was Rocco Buttiglioni. The moderator apologized to attendees, informing us that Mr. Buttiglioni would not be in attendance as he was “not feeling well at this time.” Standing in for him was Alan Sears of the Alliance Defense Fund. This replacement is worth mentioning because, on the previous day, Sears was unable to give his talk due to a delayed flight and had another participant read his speech to the auditorium. When Sears covered for Buttiglioni, however, he did not read the latter’s speech, but his own—an odd occurrence when one reflects that either a) Sears packs extra speeches with him wherever he goes, or b) someone may have known that Buttiglioni was not going to show up before his last minute cancellation and had given Sears the heads up.

Sears then warned the audience that they must be vigilant because their enemies had an insidious plan: “Freedom of worship is replacing freedom of religion.” Taken by itself, this statement highlights the core of the paranoia that characterized the entire conference, but especially the third day of the Congress: the participants do not want the right to observe their religion in a peaceful, private way that informs their daily lives. Instead, they want the acknowledgment of their apparently divinely mandated prerogative—the legal enforcement of a screaming evangelism that draws to a point in moral legislation that will allow them to enforce a single, intolerant view of existence.

If one is looking for proof of this viewpoint, they need go no further than the speaker following Sears, Paul Herzog Von Oldenburg, president of Federación Pro Europa Cristiana. Beginning his presentation with claims that “almost every single page of the Quran calls for violence against infidels,” Oldenburg quickly asserted that secular states were attempting to take control of religious bodies “in the name of ‘higher law,’ and by this I mean ‘so called human rights,’ and not the real fundamental, unchangeable rights of the human person, but the subjective, relativistic and evolving version.” It was against the encroaching threat of Islam and the ever-present threat of secular states that the speaker trotted out the complementary piece to Sears’ earlier comment about freedom of religion. “Our great ideal is to rebuild a Christian civilization from the ruins of the modern world,” Oldenburg asserted as he worked his way up to the conference’s big reveal, “just as the medieval world rose from the ruins of the Roman Empire.” Yes, ladies and gentleman, the World Congress of Families awaits with eager arms a neo-Dark Age, replete with a renewed taking up of arms against the alleged menace of Islam.

And then came the most important part of the day.

An announcement over the auditorium loudspeaker instructed everyone to keep their seats: the break between sessions was canceled so we could enjoy a special announcement from none other than Austin Ruse: “One of the problems that we have is at the end of something like the World Congress an organization is generally left holding the bag.” He then claimed that HazteOir—one of the principal groups responsible for helping the World Congress of Families come to and operate in Madrid—was on the hook for $300,000. He then released a group of tin-carrying teenagers on the crowd to collect donations to cover the hefty operational costs.

The close of the conference, for all of its paranoia and pomposity, was something of a letdown, however. A long promotional video of Australia, site of the next WCF; paranoid comments about secularism; a few goodbye speeches; and then a joint reading of what was termed the “Madrid Declaration.” Half recited in Spanish and half in English, the declaration was merely a codification of much of the vitriol and paranoia espoused over the last 72 hours. The document presents a series of affirmations such as:

> We affirm that the natural family is a fixed aspect of the created order, one ingrained in human nature. The natural family cannot change into some new shape; nor can it be re-defined by eager social engineers.

> We affirm that the natural family is the ideal, optimal, true family system. While we acknowledge varied living situations, all other “family forms” are incomplete or are mere fabrications of the state.

> We affirm the marital union of a man and a woman to be the authentic sexual bond, the only one open to the natural and responsible creation of new life.

And with that, the World Congress of Families VI in Madrid, Spain, was over. Despite the protestations against government, the frantic paranoia, the embattled mentality and terror-filled prognostications, no jackbooted security squad burst in at the final moments. No one was even verbally abused by a stranger with a dissenting opinion. Reading to themselves the things they already held to be true, cheering the notions they possessed prior to arriving at the Congress, they applauded. Much like Austin Ruse on the previous day, they applauded themselves and the courage it took to show up and say things that perfectly corresponded with the worldview of those around them. If the World Congress of Families is about anything, it is most certainly about the inherent sadness that arises from seeing things in a way that is fundamentally irreconcilable with the world which we all inhabit.

As the rate of weekly worship declines, the rate of abortion also increases exponentially


World Congress of Families, Madrid 2012
  
Catholics for Choice Report on Day One: “You can’t put too much emphasis on it; but it’s very striking.”
25 May 2012

The core message of the 2012 World Congress of Families was revealed right at the outset of day one: the legitimacy of the opinions presented as fact at this event is drawn from both international consensus and science, so long as both comport with the presenters’ worldview.

Within 20 minutes of the conference’s opening, the talking points were clear. The first was a citation from the UN Declaration on Human Rights that “the family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society, and is entitled to protection by society and the state.” The second came when speaker Jamie Mayor Ortega from the Spanish antichoice organization HazteOir asserted that “The power of the term ‘Natural Family’ also derives from the sciences—the social sciences and the natural sciences.” 

For the remainder of the day an assembly of speakers repeated these mantras while sharing their hatred of homosexuality and a woman’s right to choice, and revealing their overarching persecution complexes. The speakers struggled to make their individual viewpoints fit under a rather rickety umbrella of disdain for categories they generally agreed were bad, disgusting and dangerous. In terms of specifics the only consensus was that no proof was to be offered, no scientific studies cited.

Though attendance was announced at 2,500, the auditorium at the Palacio de Congressos de Madrid was nowhere near capacity. Of approximately 840 ground-floor seats, at best 2/3 were filled—at worst 1/2. Aside from about a dozen audio-visual crewmembers and other individuals scattered about, the spacious balcony was virtually empty. Spread out over several floors with sparse signage and rooms hidden in corners and down corridors, there was a healthy number of lost souls wandering about, attempting to find where they were supposed to be, wished to be or were instructed to be.

During the opening plenary, Dr. Javier Escrivá Ivars, visiting professor at the Faculty of Canon Law at the University of Navarra, Spain, asserted that “Heterosexuality is the anthropological basis of matrimony and if the legal concept of matrimony is destroyed the institution will follow.” Dr. Escrivá Ivars then picked up on one of the two major themes of the day when he asserted—well outside of the demonstrable evidence of any proven science—that the family was a natural fact from the dawn of time based on marriage as a natural phenomenon and the truth upon which humanity as a species is based. To continue the theme Elder Erich W. Kopischke of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints went on to compare God to gravity and man and woman and any union outside of narrowly defined moral parameters as “drifting from Him.” This was followed shortly afterwards by Lola Velarde, the president of the Institute for Family Policy’s European Network, making a series of assertions concerning the threat of a dwindling world population and broken marriages as two of the worst problems in the world—both assertions being presented with no proof to back up her claims.

The subject of a dwindling world population was the focus of the next plenary, “The Demographic Winter.” The presenters were now fully stretched and warmed up to sprinting speed; the uncited statistics and unfounded assertions came thick and fast. “The average couple that worships at least once a week has at least 2.4 more children [than a non-worshipping couple]. As the rate of weekly worship declines, the rate of abortion also increases exponentially,” stated John Mueller, the Lehrman Institute Fellow in Economics at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, Washington, DC. From whence Mr. Mueller acquired this shocking (and somewhat suspect) fact, was apparently unimportant—or, at least not important enough that he felt the need to state the source aloud. Donald Feder, director of communications at the Howard Center—the main sponsor of this event, picked up the baton from Mueller, claiming that the 42 million abortions a year was more than twice the number of deaths during World War II. Notwithstanding the inappropriate nature of the comparison between women’s decisions about whether to remain pregnant and the deaths of adults and children in wartime, most reasonable assessments of the death toll in World War II put the total at over 60 million. But facts were hard to find. Not to be outdone, Douglas Sylva of theCatholic Family and Human Rights Institute (C-FAM) relied on his recollection of statistics from three small and troubled countries—Palestine, Israel and Serbia—to make his case that declining populations would eventually shift the balance of global power. Lunch was a welcome diversion.

Despite the fact that numerous speakers throughout the day cited the United Nations Declaration on Human Rights and its definition of the role of the family in society, the afternoon session “How to Fight Back against International Law,” did not take a kind view of the UN. As chairman, C-FAM’s Austin Ruse stated this session was about the imposition of law by organizations such as UNICEF, the UNDP and a host of other organizations and “how to fight back—legally or otherwise” against them. Ruse accused these organizations of perpetuating atrocities, citing the UN’s support for reproductive health programs as evidence. Piero A. Tozzi from the Alliance Defense Fund later agreed with Ruse, claiming that UNICEF “promotes abortion wherever they have an opportunity.” The remainder of the seminar involved celebrating cases, mostly in Latin America, where a woman’s right to choose was obstructed or denied altogether or same-sex marriage was prohibited. Supply lists were also drawn up for those wishing to combat these international forces. As panelist Carmen Domínguez, professor of civil law at the Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, put it, “We need more data to counter statistics and information gathered by international organizations.” She then mentioned an instance where a Chilean doctor asserted that he had disproved assertions by the United Nations and various other groups that safe and legal abortion could alleviate maternal mortality. Domínguez failed to note that the Guttmacher Institute had decisively refuted the Chilean study.

The afternoon closed with a pair of seminars that increased the speed and density of cognitive dissonance and paranoia to what could best be described as a screeching blur. Within 30 seconds of standing up to address the (fittingly) sparsely populated seminar “The Demographic Winter” (a quite necessary expansion of the previous plenary session of the same name), Steve Mosher of the Population Research Institute implied that the Club of Rome had taken part in a Masonic conspiracy to misrepresent the levels of natural resources in a book they published close to 40 years ago. There was no conspiracy, Masonic or otherwise; our ability to find and access those resources has simply improved dramatically since then.

A session just down the hall entitled “Birth Control (Contraception) vs. Natural Family Planning,” was perhaps the best attended session of the day. Attendees also heard some of the most bizarre information of the day. Discussing the alleged detrimental effects of birth control pills, Joseph Meaney of Human Life International (HLI) first dismissed the studies on the environmental effects of oral contraception as silly stories about gender changing in fish, and urged the audience to instead consider the effects of the pill upon women. Within moments, he began citing studies involving the effects of birth control on animals (per the prevailing custom of the WCF he failed to specify them in any identifiable way). Animals in Krueger National Park in South Africa behaved bizarrely after they were given birth control pills. A macaque monkey called Austin “began to rape, masturbate and act completely incoherently confused” when the females in his troop were put on the pill. Returning to his initial plea to ignore these stories, Meaney then immediately added, “These are animals studies, so, you can’t put too much emphasis on it; but it’s very striking.”

And with that statement Joseph Meaney explained the underpinning of the entire day: “You can’t put too much emphasis on it; but it’s very striking.” Indeed. 

Tuesday, May 29, 2012

World Congress of Families, Madrid 2012

An Introductory Report: Multidimensional Challenges Ahead
The Echo Chamber at the World Congress of Families

This weekend, May 25–27, the biennial World Congress of Families (WCF) international conference will be held in Madrid, Spain. Running under the banner “Marriage and the Family: The Future of Society,” this year’s conference promises to be an echo chamber for regressive social views presented by advocates from a variety of arch-conservative organizations, notably the Howard Center for Family, Religion and Society, its sponsor. Biographies for selected speakers are available here.

Catholics for Choice has reported from several previous iterations of the WCF. Our previous reports are available here. Because of the nature of these gatherings, and the fact that antichoice activists tend to hold them up as examples of a new dawn in antichoice activity, we attend and report on the events in order to provide the truth about what is happening: who is there and what they are saying. Providing accurate information about the opposition’s activities helps all of us counter their propaganda from a position of strength.

The choice of Spain as the venue also provides us an opportunity to assess what really lies behind the noises that the conservative Spanish government has made about reversing the progressive laws passed under the last administration. It is clear that the decision to host this event in Spain was at least somewhat driven by the notion that “the faithful” must drive headfirst into the heart of iniquity, slaying the dragon of modernity in order to achieve salvation, both here and in the hereafter. However, as they tilt towards these windmills on Don Quixote’s home turf, it is entirely possible that a sexually progressive and politically active opposition may show up to protest. In which case, the World Congress of Families may draw some attention—just not the sort of attention that, even if they want it, will be beneficial to their cause.

One might suppose that given the current global economic climate, a significant portion of the World Congress of Families would relate to helping families make it through the crisis. Help with real challenges like unemployment, healthcare and childcare would be welcome. With breakout sessions such as “The Homosexual Lobby,” “Effects of Social Experimentation and Same-Sex Adoption,” “Solutions to Homosexual Behavior” and “Promoting Fatherhood: the Crisis of Manhood,” however, the Congress appears far more concerned with fabricated social issues that have no substantial impact on the welfare of the family.

The WCF gives the distinct impression that it means to codify an antiquated set of social behaviors they hope will safeguard them from an “encroaching darkness,” which the majority of the world simply refers to as “change,” “the future” or even “progress.”

This viewpoint draws a special assortment of speakers at the Congress. Yet the extremist nature of previous Congresses has moved big-name speakers with sympathies to the group’s aims into last-minute cancellations—the most notable of these at the last conference being Cardinal Alfonso Trujillo and Polish President Lech Kaczynski. For this year’s conference, while there are some minor EU officials, there are no figures with any sort of instant name recognition outside of the insular community of attendees.

This is no fluke—the conference has consistently failed to meet attendance expectations. In 2007, attendees to the Warsaw event were bussed in from surrounding parishes. And at one point in 2009, the only echo to be heard was conference speaker Austin Ruse infamously tweeting “What’s going on? Where is everybody?” as he looked out on an almost-empty conference hall.

The Howard Center’s first notice on the event was titled “Multidimensional Challenges Ahead,” a background document drafted by one of the Congress speakers, Dr. Farooq Hassan. With a world of rights-empowered advocates fighting for everything the Congress is fighting against, the Madrid gathering will have its work cut out as it tries to shore up its retrograde vision of society. In the next few days, Catholics for Choice will be reporting on the World Congress of Families as it faces these many challenges with all hands on deck.

For more on Catholics for Choice’s opposition work, please read Twenty Years of Taking Down the Opposition.

Friday, December 2, 2011

WCF in Madrid

The World Congress of Families has announced that its next conference will take place next May 25-27 in Madrid.

It’s early days yet, and the website is riddled with typos and errors. They expect 2,500 attendees, but have only booked 200 hotel rooms, so perhaps they will all be from these large families that the conference hopes to promote.

The meetings have been less relevant in recent years. They had to bus people into the event in Poland (2007), and Austin Ruse was aghast about the low numbers attending the event in Amsterdam (2009), tweeting, “What's going on? Where is everybody?”

The program has been posted, but no speakers have been announced as yet. We will keep an eye on it and post any relevant updates.

info from David J. Nolan
Director of Communications
1436 U Street NW, Suite 301 • Washington, DC 20009
tel 202-986-6093 • fax 202-332-7995
djnolan@catholicsforchoice.org • catholicsforchoice.org
Catholics for Choice – In Good Conscience