Showing posts with label advocacy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label advocacy. Show all posts

Thursday, March 29, 2012

Brussels rally

прочойсеры в Брусселе, март 2012

IPPF EN welcomes the success of the European rally for Abortion Rights


Brussels 24 March 2012: Some 50 staff and friends of the International Planned Parenthood Federation European Network joined over 2200 other pro-choice activists in a European rally to protect abortion rights in Europe. This event was followed the very next day by a March for Life that gathered some 1900 anti-choice people.

Since the 30th anniversary celebrations of the Belgian abortion law which took place in 2010, anti-choice activists have been gathering each year in Brussels for a so called “March for Life”. Judging from the many participants and speakers from other European countries who joined this March, and the way similar Marches for Life are taking place in other European countries, it is pretty clear that this is an initiative led by a highly organized international network of anti-choice activists whose sole objective is to ban abortion throughout Europe and impose their religious convictions on all women.

Over the course of the last two years there has been growing opposition in various European countries such as Spain, Italy, Hungary, United Kingdom and Switzerland, resulting in various harmful acts of intimidation and attempts to revise abortion legislation. Religious beliefs combined with financial restrictions have also lead certain countries to reduce financial support for abortion services, therefore affecting the access of women and especially poor women to abortion.

IPPF EN firmly believes that sexual and reproductive health and rights should be respected, including that of a women’s right to abortion and access to affordable high-quality contraception. Therefore IPPF EN congratulates the organizers of the Abortion R!GHT event and the nearly 8,000 people who signed the Charter of the Platform for Abortion Rights.

“It was great to be so many at the pro-choice manifestation”, says Vicky Claeys, Regional Director of IPPF European Network. “However, it is extremely sad when having been on the barricades throughout the 80ties for a liberalisation of the Belgian abortion law, to have to do this again. That really hurts and is certainly something I did not expect to happen at that time.” 

Wednesday, November 2, 2011

don't cry for me Argentina

As Legislators Consider Changes to the Abortion Law, New Poll Proves Argentineans Support Access to Abortion and Reject the Influence of Catholic Bishops

As a parliamentary committee in Argentina prepares to discuss liberalizing the abortion law at a hearing on November 1, a new poll released today reveals that most Argentineans are in favor of the components of legislative attempts to reform the abortion law. Currently, while abortion is legal in a few circumstances, it is largely unobtainable for most women. Over 80 percent support a woman’s right to access abortion care when her health is at risk and/or when the pregnancy is a result of rape. Almost 70 percent of those polled were in favor of abortion being available when the fetus has severe abnormalities. One of the most striking disparities revealed by the survey was that, while abortion may currently be almost completely unobtainable in Argentina, a third of Argentineans know someone who has had an abortion (34 percent).

Friday, October 28, 2011

Republicans' war on abortion rights continues: But we can't give up the fight for women's rights

On Nov. 8, Mississippi residents will vote on a proposed constitutional amendment that would categorize a fertilized human egg as a legal person. If passed, this measure would prohibit not only abortion, but common birth control methods such as the IUD. While a similar measure was twice defeated in Colorado, in 2008 and 2010, by wide margins, other states - including Florida and Ohio - are considering comparable initiatives.
These attacks are dangerous, but they are nothing new, part of a century-long war on women. While we all know it generally takes two to tango when it comes to sex, One hundred years ago this month, my grandmother began her career as an advocate. A recent arrival in New York herself, Margaret Sanger worked as a nurse in the lower East Side, where immigrants lived crowded in fetid tenements and the infant mortality rate was of Third World proportions.
My grandmother was particularly struck by the daily drudgery of mothers. She immediately saw the connection between the dire living conditions and the fact that many births were unwanted, recalling one 72 year-old woman who said "she would gladly have another baby if nature were willing, but her daughters and sons, who had endured poverty and neglect. . .preferred risking imprisonment and death rather than bearing children and have them go through what they lived through."
My grandmother soon learned that women were routinely denied access to contraception and information about how to prevent pregnancies. It was the attitude at the time that women - and women alone - were responsible for the consequences of marital relations. The draconian Comstock Laws made it illegal to distribute contraceptives or provide educational materials about sexual health or reproduction, as this information was then considered "lascivious."
My grandmother soon discovered that Comstock carried implications far more serious than censorship when she tried to save the life of one of her patients following a botched back-alley abortion. She swore "no more" and founded the birth control movement in America, subsequently opening the first of her clinics in the Brownsville section of Brooklyn.
Her clinic was open less than two weeks before being closed by the police as a "public nuisance." She went to jail for 30 days, but kept fighting, eventually founding the International Planned Parenthood Federation.
Today, IPPF has more service points worldwide than McDonald's does franchises, providing millions with contraception and reproductive health care each year. In the U.S., Planned Parenthood partners with city, state and federal health agencies to bring healthcare to those who cannot afford it.
But then again, many modern-day Comstocks are seeking to characterize sex as a public threat, trying to pass legislation that will once more burden the poorest of mothers. The proposed amendment in Mississippi - as well as other anti-woman initiatives brewing in other states - compromises decades of hard- won gains in public health, all for the sake of outdated and dangerous ideology. There is, in fact, nothing ideal about denying women the health services and education they need and want: We know from experience that women will risk their lives to avoid unwanted pregnancies.
My grandmother's cause began a century ago this month in the slums of lower Manhattan; her fight continues today. And like Margaret Sanger, we will not retreat until reproductive rights and health become a reality for all.
Source: Alexander Sanger, New York Daily News, 27 October 2011

Saturday, August 27, 2011

LifeSiteNews Lies

A dying nation: Russia’s abortion crisis

I can not comment on emotional stuff, but a few figures about this message:

In the last 20 years, an estimated 80 million unborn Russian children are believed to have been aborted.

“Russia is facing a very serious demographic problem. We’re losing almost three quarters of a million people every year,” said Alexey Komov, chairman of the Moscow Demographic Summit.

Currently, Russia has a birth rate per woman of 1.2, according to Komov, whereas the replacement rate for any population is at least 2.1. Similar numbers are found in China, Japan, and Eastern European countries. According to 2010 data by the CIA World Factbook, the United States has just slipped below replacement rate at 2.06 children born per woman.
  • Total number of abortions in 1991-2010 is about 44 mln, that's a lot. Why multiply? (warning >> important update: not all reported abortions are induced, a number of miscarriages is about 1/10th of total)
  • 3/4 mln a year -- average decline for the period 1990-2009 is 287,529, with range from +608,665 (1990) to -720,668 (2005), i.e., about 3/4 mln drop occured in the only single year.
  • Average total fertility rate 1990-2009 was about 1.4, ranging from 1.9 (1990) to 1.2 (1999) and about (rounding to the first digit) 1.2 in a period 1997-2001
Btw, the US do not have any pronatalist policy having the highest fertility

Data are somewhat filtered to generate bias.

Most important is the simple fact: the situation is really unpleasant, fertility is low, and mortality (not shown) is high, but antichoice measures will definitely lead to its worsening. E.g., when imposing abortion ban Poland had the same fertility as Russia, now Russian fertility is higher.

Wednesday, July 27, 2011

abortion reduction participation


In this pic you see GAR (general abortion rate = number of abortions/women 15-49) -- blue line.
Three different trends have been linearly estimated, each trend corresponds to a separate major controller of a period:

  1. red line -- soviet/communist slow diffusion of new, or not so new contraceptive methods
  2. yellow line -- a period of government support to family planning programs coordinated by Russian Family Planning Association
  3. green line -- most recent or Putin period of hard invasion of Russian Orthodox Church into so intimate area


follow updates -- I will calculate differentials in numbers of abortions
one thing is almost clear -- if RFPA was to continue the problem might be exhausted in 2005

Thursday, July 21, 2011

case of Poland

Путин и Тускarrived from ASTRA

Dear all,

As you all know Polish lawmakers decided to press ahead with work on draft legislation banning abortions altogether, even for women who were raped, are carrying deformed foetuses or face health risks.

We would like to ask you to send the sample letter below to the Polish Prime Minister, who is also the head of the biggest party currently running for re-election. Send a letter today to the Polish PM to prevent criminalization of abortion.

Please send the letter to : Donald.Tusk@sejm.pl with federa@astra.org.pl in cc


Thank you so much for your support and disseminating the message in your networks!
Love us or at least like us on FB: https://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/ASTRA-Network/113128578712592

Thanks and regards!
ASTRA Secretariat

---------------------


Your Excellency,

I write to express my concern that the draft text for the new bill on abortion: "The law on changing the Law on family planning, protection of the human fetus and conditions for legal abortion" - to be discussed by the Parliament's Committee by the 1st of September - contains provisions that will result in violations of women's sexual and reproductive rights and health.

The international human rights standard is to liberalize abortion laws to make it safe and accessible to women and thereby lessen maternal mortality related to unsafe abortion. The language used in the draft of the new bill regarding the right to life does not correspond to that used in international and European human rights instruments - to which Poland is also party - as it unconditionally prohibits abortion, thereby leading not to lessening the number of women inducing abortion but only makes it dangerous for women who will undergo clandestine and unsafe abortion. Passing the bill will increase maternal mortality, abortion-related injuries and deaths are likely to be especially high among poor women, who can't afford to travel abroad. As a result, many of them might try self-induced abortions.

It is unacceptable that in the 21st Century, a European country includes in its legislation a provision which directly endangers women's lives. I trust that you will do your best to ensure that Poland considers reviewing its legislation regarding abortion in a forward-looking legislation, taking the lead in promoting women's sexual and reproductive rights.

Sincerely yours,
my addition:Being a Russian I am very afraid that my country will follow your way, forgetting its own sad experience of 1936-1955 as well as even more sad one of Romania.

upg: Russian pro choice coalition open letter (in Ru)

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

Reaction in Norway

Sex og Politikk published a material about abortion dispute in Russia and East Europe
have a look at
Økende motstand mot abort i Øst-Europa

Saturday, July 16, 2011

Russia: Anti-Abortion Legislation and Campaign

The anti-choice campaign started by the Russian Orthodox Church after the State Duma introduced amendments to a draft law that would place some restrictions on abortion. The amendments would institute a mandatory waiting period for abortions of 48 hours to one week, depending on how long the woman had been pregnant. They would also require women to sign a statement that they agreed to abortion after reading of possible negative consequences, including “the onset of infertility.” Women over six weeks pregnant would be required to see their embryo or fetus on ultrasound, hear its heartbeat and have counseling. Another amendment would restrict sale of the morning-after pill. It is proposed that abortions after the twelfth week of pregnancy are excluded from the list of mandatory medical services, except in the case of medical necessity or when the pregnancy occurred as a result of rape. The proposed law prohibits the sale of abortion-inducing drugs over the counter without a prescription from a physician [it is likely the most stupid item of antichoice innovations, revealing lack of knowledge about the topic]. Also, it is proposed that the European practice of giving up new-born babies for adoption anonymously is introduced. Rallied by dioceses across Russia, campaigners marked International Children’s Day by distributing leaflets on dangers of abortion and releasing hundreds of balloons over Ulyanovsk, Lenin’s birthplace [abortion was a must there in 1870], to support “Russia without abortions.” Official statistics say 1.3 million abortions were performed in 2009 in Russia, in a population of just under 143 million and falling. Opponents of abortion and the morning-after pill, which they lump together [not only morning after, but all other methods as well, except for natural], say the real number is much higher. Abortion was common and readily available in the Soviet era, championed by early 20th-century Communists in the name of women's liberation. After the Soviet Union became the first country to legalize abortion [actually RSFSR in 1920, the USSR started in 1922], it was [very severely] restricted by Stalin in his drive to increase the population. In the post-Stalin era, however, Soviet women sometimes [very often] had multiple abortions, either because they had little access to contraception or feared it [a result of state medicine intimidation].

arrived with ASTRA subscription as CEE Bulletin on Sexual and Reproductive Rights No 07 (98) 2011

Monday, July 4, 2011

More on Moscow anti choice meeting

Battling Global Population Control: The Philippine Experience

Moscow Demographic Summit Opens Wednesday -- Speakers Include Leaders, Scholars and Activists from Around the World

Rebuilding the Russian family by Carolyn Moynihan

Orthodox Piracy

"Jolly Roger"One more very interesting piece excellently written by Sophia

I would like to add two statements:
I mean that the only creation possible is a capture of already existing clinics, the question is how many they will be able to capture

Russian pro-lifers to launch women's health clinics that don't provide abortions

Sophia Kishkovsky
1 July 2011
Moscow (ENInews). A Russian pro-life organization is about to launch a network of clinics offering pre- and post-natal care while excluding procedures such as abortion and in-vitro fertilization that "contradict the teachings of the Russian Orthodox, Catholic and traditional Protestant churches," said Alexey Komov, the project manager.

The Life-Family Medical Centers Network will be run on a franchise basis under the auspices of "Za Zhizn" ("For Life"), an anti-abortion organization led by two Russian Orthodox priests. Its formation was announced in Moscow on 30 June at the end of a two-day summit held by the Rockford, Illinois-based World Congress of Families (WCF). The clinics will cooperate with American organizations such as Heartbeat International, which also runs pro-life medical centers.

Komov, who is the WCF representative in Russia and most of the former Soviet Union, said applications to join the project have already come in from 30 cities. Muslims and Jews who are against abortion will also be welcome. The first clinic should open within a month, he said.

"This is a new niche," said Komov. "We think the idea is in the air. We guarantee that people who come to the clinics, whether Christians or from other traditions, can rest assured they won't be forced to have abortions or pre-natal screenings that harm expectant mothers."

Russia has one of the highest abortion rates in the world, and pro-lifers say women are often pushed into having them. Komov said doctors who had to leave state or private clinics because they refused to perform abortions would be hired by the Life-Family Medical Centers.

The two-day "Moscow Demographic Summit: The Family and the Future of Humankind" offered tangible evidence of a new alliance between American evangelicals and the Russian Orthodox Church. Participants discussed ways to stem Russia's precipitous population decline, fight abortion and sexual immorality--seen as root causes of the demographic crisis--and promote large families as a social model. Many speakers also condemned contraception.

In another sign of changing times, the event had Russian corporate sponsors, including UralSib and Interros, two of the country's biggest financial holding companies.

Summit participants included officials and activists from as far away as the Philippines and as close as Ulyanovsk, Vladimir Lenin's birthplace, in addition to Hungarian government officials seeking support for a sanctity-of-life clause they added to their constitution.

Among the speakers was Janice Shaw Crouse, a former speechwriter for President George H.W. Bush, and a senior fellow at the Beverly LaHaye Institute, the think tank for Concerned Women for America.

In her speech at the summit, Crouse said both Russia and the United States have suffered from the pro-choice movement. "And what a heavy price both of our great countries are paying for the choice: millions and millions of children are conceived only to die before they are born."

In a visit to the U.S. earlier this year, Metropolitan Hilarion of Volokolamsk, chairman of the Moscow Patriarchate's Department of External Church Relations, met with evangelicals. He said churches that adhere to traditional social doctrine on issues such as abortion, homosexuality, and family values are natural allies.

"It was a real encouragement for evangelicals in the States to hear the kinds of things we heard from Metropolitan Hilarion," said Crouse. "That here in Russia you've got people who are very concerned about the life issue, about the breakdown of the family, about how children are being raised, about cultural influences."

Rev. Dmitri Smirnov, a leader of the "Life" movement and an outspoken critic of gay rights, said the extra frozen embryos often destroyed after in-vitro fertilization mean a woman who has IVF treatment "is basically having the equivalent of five abortions." His colleague, Rev. Maksim Obukhov, said "It's clear that we must now create a movement in defense of the family as a whole," he said, listing modern scourges to be fought against such as abortion and homosexuality.

In the fall, Russia's parliament, with heavy lobbying from the Russian Orthodox Church, will consider legislative amendments that would place some restrictions on abortion. The Russian church would like more.

© ENInews

Friday, July 1, 2011

Nice opportunity to say NO to govt and Duma

UN CSW: Deadline For Submitting the Communications.
August 1st is the deadline for submitting the communications to the UN Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) containing information related to alleged violations of human rights that affect the status of women in any country in the world. The communications (complaints/appeals/petitions) may be submitted by any individual, non-governmental organization, group or network. The Commission does not take decisions on the merit of communication and, therefore, does not provide a remedy for the redress of individual grievances. However, it does inform the governments about the complaints and invites them to submit replies. Therefore, applying the procedure might be an useful part of advocacy and lobbying strategy.

More information is available on the web

Thursday, June 23, 2011

AntiChoice Analytics: How It Looks Like

actually very interesting -- handmade ;)
оценки античойсеров
have a look at right pane, the red solid line probably produces this statement:
During the period from 1990 to 2009 it is estimated that around 78.5 million abortions have been made, including 45.8 million registered ones.
(more analytics)
Let me say: modest style. It is not: true number is 80 million, and 45 is a tip of an iceberg :)
In fact Rosstat reports 39 359 965 abortions including miscarriages for 1992-2009, the difference of 7 mln is realistic for additional two years.

Sunday, June 12, 2011

Russians Adopt U.S. Tactics in Opposing Abortion

MOSCOW — While the United States is often derided as a model of immorality in Russia, its anti-abortion movement has become a model for Russian activists, who have even adopted the English-language term “pro-life” as their own. American-style pickets of abortion clinics are becoming a staple of the movement in Russia.
The campaign is heavily influenced by the Russian Orthodox Church, which is drawing on the tacit support of the first lady, Svetlana Medvedeva, and prominent politicians. The church, increasingly vocal on social issues under Patriarch Kirill I, draws on widespread fears that Russians may become an ethnic minority in their own vast country.

This week, politicians introduced amendments to a draft law in the State Duma that would place some restrictions on abortion. Rallied by dioceses across Russia, demonstrators marked International Children’s Day by distributing leaflets on dangers of abortion and releasing hundreds of balloons over Ulyanovsk, Lenin’s birthplace, to support “Russia without abortions.”

Abortion was common and readily available in the Soviet era, championed by early 20th-century Communists in the name of women’s liberation. After the Soviet Union became the first country to legalize abortion (actually 2 years before the USSR), it was restricted by Stalin in his drive to increase the population. In the post-Stalin era, however, Soviet women sometimes had multiple abortions, either because they had little access to contraception or feared it.

Official statistics say 1.3 million abortions were performed in 2009 in Russia, in a population of just under 143 million and falling. Opponents of abortion and the morning-after pill, which they lump together, say the real number is much higher.
“The number of abortions in our country reaches six to eight million a year,” said Valery Draganov, who proposed more rigid anti-abortion legislation in the Duma last week that was hastily withdrawn, highlighting tension on the issue. “Every minute, two abortions are carried out in Russia. Due to botched abortions, 20 percent of families lose the ability to become parents. One in every five pregnant women who dies, dies as a result of abortion (in 2009 -- 41 deaths due to abortion, out of 388 total maternal deaths, i.e,, one in ten, see more data). These are catastrophic statistics.”
Some abortion opponents are more strident. A Moscow priest, the Rev. Dmitri Smirnov, said last year that women who have abortions should be jailed for murder and that women considering abortion should be advised “not to be worse than Himmler and Goebbels, who didn’t kill their own children.” Russian feminists condemned his remarks.

The amendments would institute a mandatory waiting period for abortions of 48 hours to one week, depending on how long the woman had been pregnant. They would also require women to sign a statement that they agreed to abortion after reading of possible negative consequences, including “the onset of infertility.”
Women over six weeks pregnant would be required to see their embryo or fetus on ultrasound, hear its heartbeat and have counseling. Another amendment would restrict sale of the morning-after pill.

Yelena Mizulina, chair of the Duma committee that proposed the amendments, said that Russians support a waiting period before abortions are granted but that for now only 25 percent (source?) favor eliminating state financing for early-term abortions. Late last year, at a forum, she was stridently against abortion.

That forum was convened by Sanctity of Motherhood, an organization led by Natalia Yakunina, the wife of Vladimir Yakunin, the powerful chief of Russia’s railroads, who has created several foundations (wow! here is the ticket price's rise) to back the Russian Orthodox Church and to promote patriotism.

Speakers urged Russian women to have at least three children. The high birth rate among Muslims in Russia was spoken of with some awe, both as a threat and as something to emulate. A Russian Orthodox priest who has 18 children was showered with praise.

Mrs. Medvedeva, whose Foundation for Social and Cultural Initiatives promotes family values, spoke of Russia’s religious pluralism. But she also talked about the “rights of a child to life” and about “socioeconomic indicators” and general lack of support that she said usually drove women to “artificial termination of pregnancy,” carefully sidestepping the word abortion or saying outright that she opposes it.

“The state must help women keep their babies,” she said.

At a roundtable session, the vice president of Mrs. Medvedeva’s foundation, Tatyana Shumova, said: “Due to the nature of our foundation and the president of our foundation, we can’t say we’re against abortion, because we would immediately be accused of curtailing democracy and violating human rights, and everyone is free to choose. (!!!)

“But we say ‘Give Me Life,”’ she said, referring to a foundation program to promote family values.

Days later, in his state of the federation address, President Dmitri A. Medvedev focused on Russia’s demographic crisis and proposed measures to lift the birth rate.

At the conference, Mrs. Yakunina said Sanctity of Motherhood was conducting a pilot program in Krasnoyarsk, an industrial city in Siberia, working with doctors and journalists to shift public opinion and women’s choice away from abortion. The abortion rate in Krasnoyarsk among women who had gone through the program dropped by 16 percent, she said, which if applied to Russia as a whole would mean 200,000 more babies a year, based on the official figure of 1.3 million annual abortions.

Russia’s anti-abortion movement is as yet small despite its influential backing and thus has not provoked a major outcry from weakly organized women’s groups. But it has created strange bedfellows.

Larry Jacobs, president of the World Congress of Families, based in Rockford, Illinois, attended the Sanctity of Motherhood forum and praised Russia’s new activists as allies. He has met with Metropolitan Hilarion of Volokolamsk, chairman of the Moscow patriarchate’s department of external church relations. On a tour of the United States, where he was invited by Jerry Fullinwider, an oil executive who has done business in Russia since the 1980s, Hilarion highlighted a vocal anti-abortion stance as a uniting factor between Russian Orthodoxy and Protestant evangelicals. He has said they should form a “strategic alliance” with Roman Catholics.

Under Patriarch Kirill, the church has embraced evangelical tactics as it reaches out to Russians who are nominally Orthodox but rarely churchgoing. In addition, the anti-abortion oratory familiar in the United States has found fertile ground in Russia. Graphic Web sites, posters and leaflets are supplemented with sweeping references to Russian history. An international anti-abortion meeting will be held in Moscow this month with Mr. Jacobs's group. A brochure features blurbs by Mr. Medvedev and Prime Minister Vladimir V. Putin on the need to raise  the birth rate.
There is increasing support for restricting abortions along lines suggested by Patriarch Kirill earlier this year, Archpriest Vsevolod Chaplin, chairman of the patriarchate’s department on church and society relations, said at a news conference at RIA Novosti, an official state news agency.

“It’s clear that society’s attitude toward this phenomenon is changing, and I think that we have all we need so as to change radically society’s attitude toward abortion, so that abortion would become absolutely morally inadmissible and this would be reflected in politics and law,” he said.

By SOPHIA KISHKOVSKY (NYT)

reaction in a blog
upg: what do you think about pro choice world congress in, say, Moscow?
Russian version (inosmi translated)

Monday, June 6, 2011

Moscow Anti Choice Rally, June 5, 2011

представитель «Единой России» Руслан КузнецовI attended that rally. My impressions are here (in Russian): #1, #2, and #3.

The greatest surprise is support for antichoicers arrived from Putin's party Unified Russia, and lack of visible support from Russian Orthodox Church. Ruslan Kuznetsov (UR) speaks for life from conception (photo).

Recent news about the fate of anti-abortion initiatives prepared by former Russian family planning association (now Population and Development):

The fact is that the pro-kremlin MP Valeriy Draganov (a very religious person!) has registered his proposal on June 1, but in an hour time disregarded it! His own explanations why did he introduced his draft (being representative of a different Committee) were very unclear and of such a sort, like that population at his territory was pushing him to regulate abortions, as well as several members from Mizulina` Committee send him an official letter to support and fasten their initiative with the measures towards abortions reduction.

Since these days a Basic Law on Health-care passed through the First Readings, there is a need to correspond to it. Thus Mizulina and her colleagues did not register their Amandements yet, they will change their proposal in order to "fill in" the mentioned Basic Law in the part of abortions. Mizulina was just furious mentioning that she trusts her working Group members and could not think that there was "a leakage" of the document to the press and stipulated that Valeriy Draganov "opened" one of the previous versions of the draft that the Working Group has prepared. The importance of the proposal is socially high and Mizulina is planning not to foster their proposal, she mentioned also that there is a need to listen to the "voice of the society". The Group will meet in June once again and will develop their new tactics towards their battle with abortions.

Seems that we can have a short breath now since none of the Drafts is registered at the Governmental Duma. But there is a vital necessity to put as much blocks to it as possible.